[PATCH v3 00/12] remoteproc: Add support for i.MX8M[M/N/P/Q] and i.MX93

[Peng Fan]

> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] remoteproc: Add support for
> i.MX8M[M/N/P/Q] and i.MX93
> 
> Hi Fabio,
> 
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2025 at 08:28:50AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> >Hi Peng,
> >
> >On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 9:48 PM Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> CI: https://dev.azure.com/pengfan/uboot-
> ci/_build/results?buildId=21
> >>
> >> This patch series introduces remoteproc support for NXP i.MX8M
> and
> >> i.MX93 platforms. Most of the i.MX-specific logic is ported from the
> >> Linux kernel to ensure compatibility and maintainability.
> >
> >I'm getting the following ut_dm_dm_test_remoteproc_elf error in
> Gitlab CI:
> >
> >https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-imx/-
> /jobs/1274168#L276
> 
> Not sure why it fails, my azure CI pass.
> I build this with sandbox64_defconfig using my local PC and run ./u-
> boot -d arch/sandbox/dts/sandbox64.dtb With command: ut dm
> dm_test_remoteproc_elf I not see failures.
> 
> Let me rebase to latest master, push to CI and retest.

Still no clue why sandbox amd64 pass, but sandbox arm64 clang fail.

More and more I am thinking this might be compiler or else caused
the issue.

I am not sure how to run the arm64 sandbox clang test at my local,
I built sandox64 with aarch64 gcc and ran it on i.MX8MP-EVK, no
issue.

I may rework patch 1 to avoid introducing io_iomem.

Thanks,
Peng.

> 
> Thanks,
> Peng