[PATCH v3 00/12] remoteproc: Add support for i.MX8M[M/N/P/Q] and i.MX93

[Tom Rini]

On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 12:31:50AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] remoteproc: Add support for
> > i.MX8M[M/N/P/Q] and i.MX93
> > 
> > Hi Fabio,
> > 
> > On Sun, Oct 26, 2025 at 08:28:50AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > >Hi Peng,
> > >
> > >On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 9:48 PM Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> CI: https://dev.azure.com/pengfan/uboot-
> > ci/_build/results?buildId=21
> > >>
> > >> This patch series introduces remoteproc support for NXP i.MX8M
> > and
> > >> i.MX93 platforms. Most of the i.MX-specific logic is ported from the
> > >> Linux kernel to ensure compatibility and maintainability.
> > >
> > >I'm getting the following ut_dm_dm_test_remoteproc_elf error in
> > Gitlab CI:
> > >
> > >https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-imx/-
> > /jobs/1274168#L276
> > 
> > Not sure why it fails, my azure CI pass.
> > I build this with sandbox64_defconfig using my local PC and run ./u-
> > boot -d arch/sandbox/dts/sandbox64.dtb With command: ut dm
> > dm_test_remoteproc_elf I not see failures.
> > 
> > Let me rebase to latest master, push to CI and retest.
> 
> Still no clue why sandbox amd64 pass, but sandbox arm64 clang fail.
> 
> More and more I am thinking this might be compiler or else caused
> the issue.
> 
> I am not sure how to run the arm64 sandbox clang test at my local,
> I built sandox64 with aarch64 gcc and ran it on i.MX8MP-EVK, no
> issue.

How about with aarch64 clang on that device? I would hope you could grab
the official aarch64 binaries, but as a worst case, building an image
with OpenEmbedded that includes llvm, etc, should suffice.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20251029/a339fb2a/attachment.sig>