[PATCH v3 5/5] Image size checks: Simplify SPL_SIZE_LIMIT logic

[Philip Oberfichtner]

On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 02:59:01PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 9/3/25 12:56 PM, Philip Oberfichtner wrote:
> > Simplify the depends-on logic for SPL_SIZE_LIMIT. No functional change.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Philip Oberfichtner <pro at denx.de>
> > ---
> >   Kconfig | 2 +-
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Kconfig b/Kconfig
> > index aa00669ba20..343299eed50 100644
> > --- a/Kconfig
> > +++ b/Kconfig
> > @@ -588,8 +588,8 @@ config HAS_SPL_SIZE_LIMIT
> >   config SPL_SIZE_LIMIT
> >   	hex "Maximum size of SPL image in bytes"
> >   	depends on HAS_SPL_SIZE_LIMIT
> > -	default 0x11000 if ARCH_MX6 && !MX6_OCRAM_256KB
> >   	default 0x31000 if ARCH_MX6 && MX6_OCRAM_256KB
> > +	default 0x11000 if ARCH_MX6
> This makes it less obvious what the other case (!256 kiB SRAM SoCs) covers,
> why is that an improvement ?

This was originally Heinrich's idea. I personally find it better this
way, but I won't argue about it. Can you please find a consensus the two
of you?