Bootstd for sunxi

Tom Rini trini at konsulko.com
Thu Sep 25 03:06:15 CEST 2025


On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 06:34:53PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> On Wed, 24 Sept 2025 at 10:34, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 10:28:45AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > After the discussion on the call this week and Andre's suggestion of
> > > putting FEL as the first global boothmeth, I took a look this morning.
> > >
> > > I created a new v7 series without the 'efi_loader: bootstd: Drop
> > > bootmgr for sunxi' patch.
> > >
> > > It seems to run OK on a Linksprite_pcDuino3 but I'm not sure that is
> > > enough. The FEL boothmeth is first, which is good. But Heinrich did a
> > > series to reorder bootmgr which hasn't landed and specifically I had
> > > concerns about this patch[1].
> > >
> > > Given that Heinrich can't make the calls, I'll talk it through with
> > > him separately and reply on this thread. For now I don't see much
> > > benefit in sending the new v7 series, but I can if desired.
> >
> > The biggest blocking part of the sunxi series became that it showcased
> > the more generic problem with integration of EFI and standard boot [2]
> > so yes, getting that resolved first is the next big blocker for trying
> > to migrate more platforms. It was unclear to me then, and still unclear
> > to me now what the value is in exposing more platforms to what I believe
> > ends up being a less than optimal experience is compared with what they
> > experience today.
> 
> I'm not sure about the less-than-optimal, but I suspect this is the
> bootmgr kicking in and checking the network. Heinrich has something
> for that and I'll talk to him in a day or two.

Well, that's not how [2] was summarized, but it's hard to know without
anyone being able to try it.

> > But since no one can actually test things out and see what is or is not
> > different with the switch, yes, you should post v7.
> 
> OK, done! Something wrong with CI, but not sure what.

It seems something is going on with docker.com.

> > [2]: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20241113150938.1534931-4-sjg@chromium.org/#3418689
> >
> > --
> > Tom

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20250924/9cb50597/attachment.sig>


More information about the U-Boot mailing list