[U-Boot] [STATUS] [ARM]

[Tom Rini]

On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut at gmail.com> wrote:
>> hi Albert,
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Albert ARIBAUD
>>
>> <albert.u.boot at aribaud.net>wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I just did a ./MAKEALL arm with ELDK42 on the u-boot-arm/master for which
>> > I just sent a pull request.
>> >
>> > The raw result is:
>> >
>> > --------------------- SUMMARY ----------------------------
>> > Boards compiled: 283
>> > Boards with warnings or errors: 61 ( actux1_4_16 actux1_4_32 actux1_8_16
>> > actux1_8_32 actux2 actux3 actux4 ca9x4_ct_vxp cam_enc_4xx colibri_pxa270
>> > dvlhost efikamx efikasb ethernut5 flea3 harmony hawkboard hawkboard_uart
>> > highbank imx27lite imx31_litekit imx31_phycore imx31_phycore_eet
>> > km_kirkwood km_kirkwood_pci m28evk magnesium mcx medcom mgcoge3un
>> > mt_ventoux mx28evk mx31ads mx31pdk mx35pdk mx51evk mx53ard mx53evk
>> > mx53loco mx53smd mx6qarm2 mx6qsabrelite nhk8815 nhk8815_onenand
>> > omap1610h2_cs_autoboot omap1610inn_cs_autoboot paz00 pdnb3 plutux portl2
>> > qong scpu seaboard tt01 twister ventana vision2 vpac270_nor_128
>> > vpac270_nor_256 vpac270_ond_256 )
>> > ------------------------------**----------------------------
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> > The rest:
>> >
>> > cam_enc_4xx ethernut5 hawkboard hawkboard_uart highbank km_kirkwood
>> > km_kirkwood_pci mcx mgcoge3un mt_ventoux omap1610h2_cs_autoboot
>> > omap1610inn_cs_autoboot portl2 twister
>> >
>> > Fail with various causes; I'll send out individual status mails (CC:
>> > interested parties) later today.
>>
>> I pulled in a new u-boot-arm tree, and am able to compile both hawkboard
>> and hawkboard_uart fine. I use a 4.6.2 based gcc(arm-none-eabi) and a 2.21
>> binutils. Can you please send me a log of the errors you get for the
>> hawkboard. Thanks.
>
> Can you please try with ELDK 5.1 and ELDK 4.2 ? These are toolchains that the u-
> boot has to be compilable with without errors. If it isn't, there's a problem in
> the code.

I'll grab those as well but we'll have different warnings with
toolchains due to the rel.dyn/bss overlap issue that was eventually
(apparently) fixed.  I don't think any of these (of
davinci/omap*/am33xx) are fatal, just warnings.

-- 
Tom