[U-Boot] Unable to run scripts with autoscr command

Asif Sulikeri asifiqbal.rs at gmail.com
Mon Feb 27 06:57:19 CET 2012


Hi any updates on this?

On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 6:44 AM, Graeme Russ <graeme.russ at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Asif,
>
> On 02/24/2012 04:43 PM, Asif Sulikeri wrote:
> > Thanks Graeme,
> >
> > replies in-line,
>
> Appreciated (after all, that is ML etiquette)
>
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Graeme Russ <graeme.russ at gmail.com
> > <mailto:graeme.russ at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi Asif,
> >
> >     On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Asif Sulikeri <
> asifiqbal.rs at gmail.com
> >     <mailto:asifiqbal.rs at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >     > Hi, any updates on this, this is a blocker for me, and waiting for
> your
> >     > suggestions to resolve this issue.
> >
> >     >
> >     > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Asif Sulikeri
> >     <asifiqbal.rs at gmail.com <mailto:asifiqbal.rs at gmail.com>>wrote:
> >     >
> >     >> Detlev Zundel <dzu <at> denx.de <http://denx.de>> writes:
> >     >>
> >     >> Appreciate your reply Detlev, please find my replies in-line,
> >     >>
> >     >> > what is the "DM365-IPNC-1.0.14" version about?  I cannot see
> such a
> >     >> > version (or tag) in mainline U-Boot.
> >     >>
> >     >> I'm sorry for the typo that is supposed to be 1.0.1.
> >
> >     >Don't expect much response if you stay with version 1.0.1
> >
> >
> >
> > I'm sorry for all the confusion, the u-boot version is actually 1.3.4 and
> > 1.0.1 is added as a suffix for internal use, sorry for that. Am I still
> not
> > liable to get help for this version(1.3.4) of u-boot?
>
> Nope - 1.3.4 is 3.5 years old - more than half of the commits in mainline
> have been applied since then.
>
> >     >> > On the other hand, davinci_dm365evm is a supported
> configuration in
> >     >> > mainline, so why not try current code.  This way we would be in
> a much
> >     >> > better position to help you.
> >     >> >
> >     >>
> >     >> I'll consider the suggestion, but since I've spent considerable
> time on
> >     >> this,
> >     >> want to make sure where actually the problem lies.
> >
> >     Have you tried the suggestion of using the current mainline code?
> >
> >     If the problem still exists in latest mainline, you stand a fair
> >     chance that we'll make an effort to help you out :)
> >
> >
> > :) Thats definitely not the way you bail me out ;), jokes apart, I did
> try
> > using u-boot-2010.06 but the u-boot binary generated is bulky 252KB, as
> > compared the usual 150KB, this leads to another blocker as the UBL(User
> > Boot Loader) is now unable to load this bulky u-boot into RAM(or may be
> > some other issue), and gets stuck as below:
>
> Well 2010.06 is also very old - the latest release is 2011.12
>
> And the increase of 100kB is massive - are you sure you are compiling with
> the same set of options defined in the board config file? If you are sure,
> then it would be interesting to find out what has caused it. Could you try
> some intermediate releases (2008.10 is the next release after 1.3.4)
>
> > DM36x initialization passed!
> > TI UBL Base Version: 1.50
> > Boot Loader BootMode = NAND
> > Starting NAND Copy...
> > Valid magicnum, 0xA1ACED66, found in block 0x00000008.
> > Boot Mode Task Completed
> >
> > IPNC UBL Version: 1.1.0
> > Platform: DM365
> >
> > Jumping to entry point at 0x81080000
> >
> >
> > and there's no response whatsoever after this. what might be the issue
> now?
>
> This is outside my knowledge - I've Cc'd the davinci_dm365evm (Sandeep
> Paulraj), maybe he can provide some pointers...
>
> Regards,
>
> Graeme
>


More information about the U-Boot mailing list