[U-Boot] [PATCH V4 5/5] ARM: OMAP4/5: Make bootz as the default boot command

Sricharan R r.sricharan at ti.com
Fri Apr 5 10:28:05 CEST 2013


On Friday 05 April 2013 01:38 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Sricharan,
> 
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 12:44:45 +0530, Sricharan R <r.sricharan at ti.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Albert,
>>
>> On Friday 05 April 2013 12:36 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>>> Hi Sricharan,
>>>
>>> On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 11:24:34 +0530, Sricharan R <r.sricharan at ti.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> So with OMAP added to multi platform kernel,
>>>> the uImage no more contains a valid load address.
>>>> With the uboot already supporting zImage,
>>>> change the default boot command to bootz
>>>> instead.
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <nm at ti.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <r.sricharan at ti.com>
>>>> Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm at ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  include/configs/omap4_common.h |    4 ++--
>>>>  include/configs/omap5_common.h |    4 ++--
>>>>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Is there a reason why this patch does not have history?
>>>
>>> Amicalement,
>>  I had a minor change only in these two from the series.
>>  So reposted only these two with 'in-reply-to' threads.
>>  If this is not the right etiquette, then should it be
>>  update/appended in the original patch ?
> 
> My question is not about the series but only about 5/5 which has
> no patch history after the commit message delimiter (---) whereas 4/5
> has history.
> 
> If 5/5 has a minor change in V4, then it should have a history log
> indicating which minor change it was.
> 
 ok. 5/5 was just rebase on 4/5. Will add it though.
 Sorry for the miss.

Regards,
 Sricharan



More information about the U-Boot mailing list