[U-Boot] [PATCH V3 1/3] OMAP5: I2C: Enable i2c5 clocks

Sricharan R r.sricharan at ti.com
Tue Apr 9 08:42:20 CEST 2013


On Tuesday 09 April 2013 12:09 PM, Lubomir Popov wrote:
> Hi Sricharan,
> 
> On 09/04/13 09:34, Sricharan R wrote:
>> Hi Lubomir,
>>
>> On Monday 08 April 2013 04:03 PM, Lubomir Popov wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Lubomir Popov <lpopov at mm-sol.com>
>>> ---
>>> V3 consolidates this patch into a series.
>>>
>>>  arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap5/hw_data.c |    1 +
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap5/hw_data.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap5/hw_data.c
>>> index e5e41fd..5698876 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap5/hw_data.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap5/hw_data.c
>>> @@ -412,6 +412,7 @@ void enable_basic_uboot_clocks(void)
>>>  		(*prcm)->cm_l4per_i2c2_clkctrl,
>>>  		(*prcm)->cm_l4per_i2c3_clkctrl,
>>>  		(*prcm)->cm_l4per_i2c4_clkctrl,
>>> +		(*prcm)->cm_l4per_i2c5_clkctrl,
>>>  		(*prcm)->cm_l3init_hsusbhost_clkctrl,
>>>  		(*prcm)->cm_l3init_fsusb_clkctrl,
>>>  		0
>>
>>   Please note that whatever is above the '----' gets committed.
>>   So now all the 3 patches will not have any commit message.
> 
> Ooops... So much work, so little time... Should I do a V4?
> 

ya, because a patch without a commit log would look really blank :)

Regards,
 Sricharan


More information about the U-Boot mailing list