[U-Boot] fatwrite problem
Ruud Commandeur
RCommandeur at clb.nl
Fri Apr 12 17:23:35 CEST 2013
Hi Tom,
Sorry if I "mislead" you, but my code change is quite the same as was
posted by Damien. I would be more than happy to send what you ask for,
but I don't think this will add much. And I will have to study a bit
then how to do this....
Regards,
Ruud
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Tom Rini [mailto:tom.rini at gmail.com] Namens Tom Rini
Verzonden: vrijdag 12 april 2013 17:13
Aan: Ruud Commandeur; Beno??t Th??baudeau
CC: Mats K?rrman; u-boot at lists.denx.de
Onderwerp: Re: [U-Boot] fatwrite problem
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 05:06:35PM +0200, Ruud Commandeur wrote:
> Hi Mats,
>
> Thanks a lot, this seems to solve my problem. Nothing more actualy
than adding a "if(size)" around the code block of set_sector( ). I could
have thought of that myself, but was not sure if anything else should be
done in this case...
Since your change sounds slightly different, can you confirm that it
also solves the problem and if so post it as patch with Signed-off-by
and so forth? Thanks!
>
> Regards,
>
> Ruud
>
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Mats K?rrman [mailto:Mats.Karrman at tritech.se]
> Verzonden: vrijdag 12 april 2013 16:11
> Aan: Ruud Commandeur
> CC: u-boot at lists.denx.de
> Onderwerp: RE: fatwrite problem
>
> Hi Ruud,
>
> Ruud Commandeur wrote:
> > Once the size of the set_cluster call equals 0, the mmc command is
> > incomplete and times out. In the earlier reported problem, a patch
is
> > mentioned, but not available for dowload here. Also in the latest
> > versions of the git repository I could not find a patch for this
> > problem. Can anyone tell me if there is a fix for this problem?
>
> I asked Damien Huang (back then) and got the following reply (I think
there was
> some character encoding problem so his mail never was accepted by the
list).
> I have not further analyzed the contents, anyway it wasn't the
solution to my problem.
> BR // Mats
>
> Damien Huang wrote:
> As requested from Mats, I am resending this email. The patch is given
below:
>
> diff -cr ./u-boot-original/u-boot/fs/fat/fat_write.c
./u-boot-test/u-boot/fs/fat/fat_write.c
> *** ./u-boot-original/u-boot/fs/fat/fat_write.c 2013-02-07
14:47:33.314732999 +1100
> --- ./u-boot-test/u-boot/fs/fat/fat_write.c 2013-02-28
15:36:24.551861920 +1100
> ***************
> *** 562,596 ****
> {
> int idx = 0;
> __u32 startsect;
> !
> ! if (clustnum > 0)
> ! startsect = mydata->data_begin +
> ! clustnum * mydata->clust_size;
> ! else
> ! startsect = mydata->rootdir_sect;
> !
> ! debug("clustnum: %d, startsect: %d\n", clustnum, startsect);
> !
> ! if (disk_write(startsect, size / mydata->sect_size, buffer) < 0)
{
> ! debug("Error writing data\n");
> ! return -1;
> ! }
> !
> ! if (size % mydata->sect_size) {
> ! __u8 tmpbuf[mydata->sect_size];
> !
> ! idx = size / mydata->sect_size;
> ! buffer += idx * mydata->sect_size;
> ! memcpy(tmpbuf, buffer, size % mydata->sect_size);
> !
> ! if (disk_write(startsect + idx, 1, tmpbuf) < 0) {
> ! debug("Error writing data\n");
> ! return -1;
> ! }
> !
> ! return 0;
> ! }
> !
> return 0;
> }
>
> --- 562,595 ----
> {
> int idx = 0;
> __u32 startsect;
> ! if(size) //if there are data to be set
> ! {
> ! if (clustnum > 0)
> ! startsect = mydata->data_begin +
> ! clustnum * mydata->clust_size;
> ! else
> ! startsect = mydata->rootdir_sect;
> !
> ! debug("clustnum: %d, startsect: %d\n", clustnum, startsect);
> !
> ! if (disk_write(startsect, size / mydata->sect_size, buffer)
< 0) {
> ! debug("Error writing data\n");
> ! return -1;
> ! }
> !
> ! if (size % mydata->sect_size) {
> ! __u8 tmpbuf[mydata->sect_size];
> !
> ! idx = size / mydata->sect_size;
> ! buffer += idx * mydata->sect_size;
> ! memcpy(tmpbuf, buffer, size % mydata->sect_size);
> !
> ! if (disk_write(startsect + idx, 1, tmpbuf) < 0) {
> ! debug("Error writing data\n");
> ! return -1;
> ! }
> ! }
> ! }//end if data to be set
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff -cr ./u-boot-original/u-boot/include/configs/am335x_evm.h
./u-boot-test/u-boot/include/configs/am335x_evm.h
> *** ./u-boot-original/u-boot/include/configs/am335x_evm.h
2013-02-07 14:47:35.754702325 +1100
> --- ./u-boot-test/u-boot/include/configs/am335x_evm.h 2013-03-01
12:25:23.942104474 +1100
> ***************
> *** 143,148 ****
> --- 143,149 ----
> #define CONFIG_CMD_MMC
> #define CONFIG_DOS_PARTITION
> #define CONFIG_FS_FAT
> + #define CONFIG_FAT_WRITE
> #define CONFIG_FS_EXT4
> #define CONFIG_CMD_FAT
> #define CONFIG_CMD_EXT2
Benoit, what do you think? Thanks!
--
Tom
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list