[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/6] nand: Add SPL_NAND support to mxc_nand_spl

[Philip Paeps]

On 2013-04-19 15:00:13 (+0200), Philip Paeps <philip at paeps.cx> wrote:
> On 2013-04-19 06:10:51 (+0200), Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
> > To avoid the old function which are used with the nand_spl/ stuff
> > getting in the way of NAND SPL framework, the macro
> > CONFIG_SPL_NAND_LEGACY was introduced and two remaining legacy
> > boards were adjusted. These board need to be either fixed or
> > removed in the long run, but I don't have either.
> 
> It sounds like "fixing" these boards is mainly a matter of confirming
> that a configuration for them based around CONFIG_SPL_FRAMEWORK will fit
> in 2K.  If so, I don't think there is any reason to keep legacy support
> around.

A first build with CONFIG_SPL_FRAMEWORK came out to nearly 4K.  Large
contributors being (unsurprisingly) libcommon and libgeneric.  I had to
get rid of a puts() in libspl to make it build without those libraries.
Unfortunately, that still came out to 2.2K.  Close. :-)

I couldn't identify any obvious 100 bytes to scrap from glancing at
u-boot-spl.map or objdump -D u-boot-spl, but I'll take a look.

 - Philip


diff --git a/common/spl/spl.c b/common/spl/spl.c
index 6a5a136..c061ab4 100644
--- a/common/spl/spl.c
+++ b/common/spl/spl.c
@@ -50,7 +50,6 @@ static bd_t bdata __attribute__ ((section(".data")));
 
 inline void hang(void)
 {
-       puts("### ERROR ### Please RESET the board ###\n");
        for (;;)
                ;
 }

-- 
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Ministry of Information