[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 4/6] ARM: add SMP support for non-secure switch

Christoffer Dall cdall at cs.columbia.edu
Sat Apr 27 00:13:25 CEST 2013


On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Andre Przywara
<andre.przywara at linaro.org> wrote:
> Currently the non-secure switch is only done for the boot processor.
> To later allow full SMP support, we have to switch all secondary
> cores into non-secure state also.
>
> So we add an entry point for secondary CPUs coming out of low-power
> state and make sure we put them into WFI again after having switched
> to non-secure state.
> For this we acknowledge and EOI the wake-up IPI, then go into WFI.
> Once being kicked out of it later, we sanity check that the start
> address has actually been changed (since another attempt to switch
> to non-secure would block the core) and jump to the new address.
>
> The actual CPU kick is done by sending an inter-processor interrupt
> via the GIC to all CPU interfaces except the requesting processor.
> The secondary cores will then setup their respective GIC CPU
> interface.
>
> The address secondary cores jump to is board specific, we provide
> the value here for the Versatile Express board.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara at linaro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.S          | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  arch/arm/lib/virt-v7.c              | 10 +++++++++-
>  include/configs/vexpress_ca15_tc2.h |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.S b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.S
> index 401b0eb..2b47881 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.S
> @@ -563,8 +563,19 @@ fiq:
>  #endif /* CONFIG_SPL_BUILD */
>
>  /* Routine to initialize GIC CPU interface and switch to nonsecure state.
> + * Will be executed directly by secondary CPUs after coming out of
> + * WFI, or can be called directly by C code for CPU 0.
> + * Those two paths mandate to not use any stack and to only use registers
> + * r0-r3 to comply with both the C ABI and the requirement of SMP startup
> + * code.
>   */
>  .globl _nonsec_gic_switch
> +.globl _smp_pen
> +_smp_pen:
> +       mrs     r0, cpsr
> +       orr     r0, r0, #0xc0
> +       msr     cpsr, r0                        @ disable interrupts
> +       mov     lr, #0                          @ clear LR to mark secondary
>  _nonsec_gic_switch:
>         mrc     p15, 4, r2, c15, c0, 0          @ r2 = PERIPHBASE
>         add     r3, r2, #0x1000                 @ GIC dist i/f offset
> @@ -605,4 +616,18 @@ _nonsec_gic_switch:
>         add     r2, r2, #0x1000                 @ GIC dist i/f offset
>         str     r1, [r2]                        @ allow private interrupts
>
> -       mov     pc, lr
> +       cmp     lr, #0
> +       movne   pc, lr                          @ CPU 0 to return
> +                                               @ all others: go to sleep
> +_ack_int:
> +       ldr     r1, [r3, #0x0c]                 @ read GICD acknowledge
> +       str     r1, [r3, #0x10]                 @ write GICD EOI
> +
> +       adr     r1, _smp_pen
> +waitloop:
> +       wfi
> +       ldr     r0, =CONFIG_SYSFLAGS_ADDR       @ load start address
> +       ldr     r0, [r0]
> +       cmp     r0, r1                  @ make sure we dont execute this code
> +       beq     waitloop                @ again (due to a spurious wakeup)
> +       mov     pc, r0
> diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/virt-v7.c b/arch/arm/lib/virt-v7.c
> index 416ca29..5ca093a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/lib/virt-v7.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/lib/virt-v7.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
>
>  /* the assembly routine doing the actual work in start.S */
>  void _nonsec_gic_switch(void);
> +void _smp_pen(void);
>
>  #define GICD_CTLR      0x000
>  #define GICD_TYPER     0x004
> @@ -51,6 +52,7 @@ int armv7_switch_nonsec(void)
>         unsigned int reg;
>         volatile unsigned int *gicdptr;
>         unsigned itlinesnr, i;
> +       unsigned int *sysflags;
>
>         /* check whether the CPU supports the security extensions */
>         asm("mrc p15, 0, %0, c0, c1, 1\n" : "=r"(reg));
> @@ -109,7 +111,13 @@ int armv7_switch_nonsec(void)
>         for (i = 0; i <= itlinesnr; i++)
>                 gicdptr[GICD_IGROUPR0 / 4 + i] = (unsigned)-1;
>
> -       /* call the non-sec switching code on this CPU */
> +       /* now kick all CPUs (expect this one) by writing to GICD_SIGR */
> +       sysflags = (void *)CONFIG_SYSFLAGS_ADDR;
> +       sysflags[1] = (unsigned)-1;
> +       sysflags[0] = (uintptr_t)_smp_pen;
> +       gicdptr[GICD_SGIR / 4] = 1U << 24;
> +
> +       /* call the non-sec switching code on this CPU also */
>         _nonsec_gic_switch();
>
>         return 0;
> diff --git a/include/configs/vexpress_ca15_tc2.h b/include/configs/vexpress_ca15_tc2.h
> index 9e230ad..210a27c 100644
> --- a/include/configs/vexpress_ca15_tc2.h
> +++ b/include/configs/vexpress_ca15_tc2.h
> @@ -32,5 +32,6 @@
>  #define CONFIG_BOOTP_VCI_STRING     "U-boot.armv7.vexpress_ca15x2_tc2"
>
>  #define CONFIG_SYS_CLK_FREQ 24000000
> +#define CONFIG_SYSFLAGS_ADDR 0x1c010030
>
>  #endif
> --


hmm, is all this likely to work across all armv7 cores?  I imagined
that the SMP boot protocol could be potentially vastly different on
different implementations and this stuff would have to call into board
specific code...?


More information about the U-Boot mailing list