[U-Boot] [Patch v3] Consolidate bool type

[York Sun]

On 01/24/2013 09:54 AM, York Sun wrote:
> On 01/24/2013 09:34 AM, Allen Martin wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 02:05:26PM -0800, York Sun wrote:
>>> On 01/23/2013 02:02 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>>> On 01/23/2013 04:01:49 PM, York Sun wrote:
>>>>> On 01/23/2013 01:52 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>>>>> On 01/23/2013 03:46:04 PM, York Sun wrote:
>>>>>>> On 01/23/2013 01:41 PM, York Sun wrote:
>>>>>>> I should put RFC in the subject as I am not able to compile all ARCH
>>>>>>> myself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So how do you see this patch becoming non-RFC?  I think most people
>>>>>> don't have every single toolchain.  You should at least get a toolchain
>>>>>> for a couple major architectures such as ARM.  Usually RFC is for when
>>>>>> you know the patch has issues, and don't want it applied yet even if
>>>>>> nobody else finds fault with it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I know this version has problem. I am hoping more people get involved
>>>>> and test what they can. I tried the arm toolchain you pointed to me. I
>>>>> couldn't run MAKEALL for arm.
>>>>
>>>> Even before your patch, using USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC?  How many boards failed?
>>>>
>>> I don't know. Wolfgang brought it. Allen kindly offered help to verify
>>> on tegra which uses USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC.
>>>
>>
>> Built and tested on tegra, no problems.  I'm still seeing a lot of
>> references to  TRUE/FALSE even after this patch though:
>>
>> $ git grep -e FALSE -e TRUE | awk 'BEGIN {FS = ":"} {print $1}' | sort | uniq
>>
> Thanks, Allen. A long way to go.
> 

I thought I have replaced all #define, enum, typedef. I have left alone
those FALSE, False, false but add define like this

+#include <stdbool.h>
+#define TRUE true
+#define FALSE false
+#define True true
+#define False false

Isn't that enough?

I did miss the #if TRUE != 1 part, as pointed out by Scott. Will fix in
next rev.

York