[U-Boot] [Patch v3] Consolidate bool type
Scott Wood
scottwood at freescale.com
Thu Jan 24 19:14:37 CET 2013
On 01/24/2013 12:03:49 PM, York Sun wrote:
> On 01/24/2013 09:54 AM, York Sun wrote:
> > On 01/24/2013 09:34 AM, Allen Martin wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 02:05:26PM -0800, York Sun wrote:
> >>> On 01/23/2013 02:02 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> >>>> On 01/23/2013 04:01:49 PM, York Sun wrote:
> >>>>> On 01/23/2013 01:52 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> >>>>>> On 01/23/2013 03:46:04 PM, York Sun wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 01/23/2013 01:41 PM, York Sun wrote:
> >>>>>>> I should put RFC in the subject as I am not able to compile
> all ARCH
> >>>>>>> myself.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So how do you see this patch becoming non-RFC? I think most
> people
> >>>>>> don't have every single toolchain. You should at least get a
> toolchain
> >>>>>> for a couple major architectures such as ARM. Usually RFC is
> for when
> >>>>>> you know the patch has issues, and don't want it applied yet
> even if
> >>>>>> nobody else finds fault with it.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I know this version has problem. I am hoping more people get
> involved
> >>>>> and test what they can. I tried the arm toolchain you pointed
> to me. I
> >>>>> couldn't run MAKEALL for arm.
> >>>>
> >>>> Even before your patch, using USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC? How many
> boards failed?
> >>>>
> >>> I don't know. Wolfgang brought it. Allen kindly offered help to
> verify
> >>> on tegra which uses USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Built and tested on tegra, no problems. I'm still seeing a lot of
> >> references to TRUE/FALSE even after this patch though:
> >>
> >> $ git grep -e FALSE -e TRUE | awk 'BEGIN {FS = ":"} {print $1}' |
> sort | uniq
> >>
> > Thanks, Allen. A long way to go.
> >
>
> I thought I have replaced all #define, enum, typedef. I have left
> alone
> those FALSE, False, false but add define like this
>
> +#include <stdbool.h>
> +#define TRUE true
> +#define FALSE false
> +#define True true
> +#define False false
>
> Isn't that enough?
It's enough to make it build, but it would be better to fix the users.
-Scott
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list