[U-Boot] [PATCH] Add the symbol for the minimal SPL used to eliminate unused code

Scott Wood scottwood at freescale.com
Thu May 16 02:01:22 CEST 2013


On 05/15/2013 06:58:44 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 03:02:19PM +0800, ying.zhang at freescale.com  
> wrote:
> 
> > From: Ying Zhang <b40530 at freescale.com>
> >
> > Add the symbol CONFIG_SPL_BUILD_MINIMAL for the minimal SPL. It  
> used to
> > eliminate code unused in the minimal SPL but used in the SPL.
> [snip]
> > diff --git a/common/env_common.c b/common/env_common.c
> > index 906b41f..5d82ea0 100644
> > --- a/common/env_common.c
> > +++ b/common/env_common.c
> > @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ int set_default_vars(int nvars, char * const  
> vars[])
> >  				H_NOCLEAR | H_INTERACTIVE, nvars, vars);
> >  }
> >
> > -#ifndef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD_MINIMAL
> >  /*
> >   * Check if CRC is valid and (if yes) import the environment.
> >   * Note that "buf" may or may not be aligned.
> 
> Hold up, this ignores the whole world of CONFIG_SPL_FRAMEWORK and
> probably breaks the ARM targets.   You need to instal an ARM toolchain
> (either one of the Linaro ones or ELDK 5.x) and make sure that MAKEALL
> -a arm is also fine after your SPL changes.

Not to mention that the "minimal init" concept is currently only  
well-defined for mpc85xx, so this really doesn't belong in common/.   
Minimal 85xx SPLs don't even include libcommon, so why is this change  
needed at all?

-SCott


More information about the U-Boot mailing list