[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] spl: Make CONFIG_SPL_BUILD contain more functionality

Zhang Ying-B40530 B40530 at freescale.com
Fri May 17 18:41:53 CEST 2013


Oh, I understand. Thanks.
________________________________________
From: Wood Scott-B07421
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 4:39 PM
To: Zhang Ying-B40530
Cc: Tom Rini; u-boot at lists.denx.de; afleming at gmail.com; Wood Scott-B07421; Xie Xiaobo-R63061
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] spl: Make CONFIG_SPL_BUILD contain more functionality

On 05/17/2013 10:04:12 AM, Zhang Ying-B40530 wrote:
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Tom Rini [tom.rini at gmail.com] on behalf of Tom Rini
> [trini at ti.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 2:54 PM
> To: Zhang Ying-B40530
> Cc: Xie at theia.denx.de; u-boot at lists.denx.de; afleming at gmail.com;
> Wood at theia.denx.de; Wood Scott-B07421
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] spl: Make CONFIG_SPL_BUILD contain
> more functionality
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 02:26:04PM +0000, Zhang Ying-B40530 wrote:
> > [Zhang Ying]
> > So for this patch, are there any problem?
> >
>
> Yes. It doesn't seem to do anything.  Which is why I want to see the
> series of patches that result in new functionality on some boards, so
> we
> can evaluate the changes in context.
> [Zhang Ying]
> It seems to be several patches were sent together.

No, they weren't.  They were sent separately.  Use git format-patch to
generate all the patches at once, so they're numbered, and use git
send-email to send them all at once, so they're threaded properly.

-Scott



More information about the U-Boot mailing list