[U-Boot] [PATCH] serial: Make full device search optional

Alexander Graf agraf at suse.de
Tue Jan 30 13:34:18 UTC 2018


On 01/30/2018 02:09 PM, Derald Woods wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2018 3:17 AM, "Alexander Graf" <agraf at suse.de 
> <mailto:agraf at suse.de>> wrote:
>
>     On 01/30/2018 12:41 AM, Derald D. Woods wrote:
>
>         On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 07:46:09AM -0600, Derald Woods wrote:
>
>             On Jan 29, 2018 6:57 AM, "Alexander Graf" <agraf at suse.de
>             <mailto:agraf at suse.de>> wrote:
>
>             Commit 608b0c4ad4e5ec0c ("serial: Use next serial device
>             if probing fails")
>             added code to search for more serial devices if the
>             default one was not
>             probed correctly.
>
>             Unfortunately, that breaks omap3_evm. So while
>             investigating why that is
>             the case, let's disable the full search for everyone but
>             bcm283x where it
>             is needed.
>
>             Fixes: 608b0c4ad4e5ec0c ("serial: Use next serial device
>             if probing fails")
>             Reported-by: Derald D. Woods <woods.technical at gmail.com
>             <mailto:woods.technical at gmail.com>>
>             Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf at suse.de
>             <mailto:agraf at suse.de>>
>
>             ---
>
>             Derald, could you please test this patch and verify it
>             does indeed unbreak
>             omap3_evm?
>
>         The omap3_evm boots now with this patch applied on master. If
>         I enable
>         SERIAL_SEARCH_ALL, it does not boot. I always build cleanly
>         using the
>         default config only. On failure, there is no console
>         input/output and
>         the board unresponsive.
>
>
>     So SPL is already broken? Can you try a known working SPL with
>     SERIAL_SEARCH_ALL=y U-Boot payload on top? Does that work?
>
>
> I will give that path a try and see what I can discover. Again, it 
> will be later today or tomorrow before I can get to this. This is why 
> I asked what should the board code actually look like. As the 
> omap3_evm is ahead of some other OMAP34XX boards currently, a good 
> working example would be helpful. If omap3_evm becomes the example, 
> let's make it a good one.

If you want to make it a good example, don't disable CONFIG_EFI_LOADER :).

But really, the only major difference I saw between beagle and evm was 
the fact that evm used DM in SPL. I patched that up locally (had to 
remove ext support as the binary became too big otherwise), but that 
didn't show the issue either. So we'll have to wait on your tests.


Alex



More information about the U-Boot mailing list