[U-Boot] requesting a custodian tree for Aspeed SoCs maintenance

[Tom Rini]

On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 03:07:13AM +0000, ChiaWei Wang wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> Thank you for the feedback.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tom Rini [mailto:trini at konsulko.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2020 11:26 PM
> > To: ChiaWei Wang <chiawei_wang at aspeedtech.com>
> > Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de
> > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] requesting a custodian tree for Aspeed SoCs
> > maintenance
> > 
> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 03:19:43AM +0000, ChiaWei Wang wrote:
> > o
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We are Aspeed SW team and would like to request the creation of a
> > > u-boot-aspeed.git custodian tree for the u-boot support related to
> > > Aspeed SoCs. Attached is the SSH key generated for this purpose.
> > >
> > > By the way, the Aspeed SoCs are based on ARM architecture. However, we
> > > are not sure if the Aspeed custodian tree should be a downstream of
> > > u-boot-arm.git tree or not. As there is no update to u-boot-arm since 4 years
> > ago.
> > >
> > > If anything is further needed, please let us know.
> > 
> > To start with, I would like to handle Aspeed development by pulling respective
> > patches in to one of my testing branches and merge them after appropriate
> > review time.  If the volume of changes makes it worthwhile we can add a
> > new custodian tree later.  Thanks! 
> 
> So currently, should we simply submit individual Aspeed patches to the mailing list for the review process?
> In fact, we have sent certain patches couple days ago. (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/cover/20200803093610.3222-1-chiawei_wang@aspeedtech.com/)
> If it is the case, we will proceed the patch submission for Aspeed SoCs after the review is done.

Correct, thanks.  I'll likely be picking up those patches soon.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20200811/c5419444/attachment.sig>