Using gerrit or github for review?

Tom Rini trini at
Mon Jul 13 23:03:33 CEST 2020

On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 10:12:32PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Simon,
> In message <CAPnjgZ2OnxotZ3gGErO0KfFJVA6_jSY6xO_Kg63Ts86qTw4KBg at> you wrote:
> >
> > I have used various tools and I'm wondering whether having another
> > option might have some benefits in terms of productivity, automation
> > and accessibility. Just as one example, if people pushed patches to
> > github / gitlab then we could 1) check out the branch and try it, 2)
> > have test automation attached, 3) use a UI for review.
> As for automation, you know that Heiko has been using tbot for years
> for automatic patch series download from patchwork, checking and
> testing (checkpatch, build, install, boot)?

Perhaps this is the time we need to figure out what's missing from tbot
automation and related tooling and get things integrated well between
tbot, test/py/ testing we have and other ad-hoc tooling.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <>

More information about the U-Boot mailing list