[Binman] Question regarding SPL symbol offsets generation

Fabio Estevam festevam at gmail.com
Tue Aug 27 20:46:49 CEST 2024


Hi Lukasz,

On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 5:14 PM Lukasz Majewski <lukma at denx.de> wrote:

> Unfortunately not - this change is only for properly setting start
> address of the u-boot.
>
> The _real_ problem here is the symbol placement generated by binman
> when we try to define the image as a single one.
>
> Moreover, this change follows other boards with imx8mm processor -
> ./configs/imx8mm_beacon_fspi_defconfig to be specific.
>
> The "fix" (for which I'd been now probably opt) for this issue would be
> to generate two images with binman - one for u-boot-spl-ddr.bin and the
> final flash.bin with the former one included (as it was before SHA1:
> 37e50627efacd8dae18b564e9d8886a033e181bc)

Is QSPI boot broken on i.MX8MM?

I am adding Adam and Mamta who have tested QSPI booting on
imx8mm_beacon and imx8mm_evk, respectively.


More information about the U-Boot mailing list