[Binman] Question regarding SPL symbol offsets generation
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Tue Aug 27 21:26:45 CEST 2024
Hi,
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 at 12:47, Fabio Estevam <festevam at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Lukasz,
>
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 5:14 PM Lukasz Majewski <lukma at denx.de> wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately not - this change is only for properly setting start
> > address of the u-boot.
> >
> > The _real_ problem here is the symbol placement generated by binman
> > when we try to define the image as a single one.
> >
> > Moreover, this change follows other boards with imx8mm processor -
> > ./configs/imx8mm_beacon_fspi_defconfig to be specific.
> >
> > The "fix" (for which I'd been now probably opt) for this issue would be
> > to generate two images with binman - one for u-boot-spl-ddr.bin and the
> > final flash.bin with the former one included (as it was before SHA1:
> > 37e50627efacd8dae18b564e9d8886a033e181bc)
>
> Is QSPI boot broken on i.MX8MM?
>
> I am adding Adam and Mamta who have tested QSPI booting on
> imx8mm_beacon and imx8mm_evk, respectively.
Note also that I sent a series[1] which allows the symbols-base to be
adjusted, if that helps.
Regards,
Simon
[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=421010
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list