[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3 V4] EXYNOS5: Add gpio pin numbering feature

Rajeshwari Birje rajeshwari.birje at gmail.com
Tue Apr 2 07:08:51 CEST 2013


Hi Minkyu Kang,

Thank you for comments.

On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang at samsung.com> wrote:
> On 21/03/13 20:33, Rajeshwari Shinde wrote:
>> This patch adds support for gpio pin numbering support on
>> EXYNOS5250
>> To have consistent 0..n-1 GPIO numbering the banks are divided
>> into different parts where ever they have holes in them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala <l.krishna at samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Rajeshwari Shinde <rajeshwari.s at samsung.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in V2:
>>         - none.
>> Changes in V3:
>>         - none.
>> Changes in V4:
>>       - To have consistent 0..n-1 GPIO numbering the banks are divided
>>       into different parts where ever they have holes in them.
>>       - Combined previous patch 1 and 2 into single patch.
>>  arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/pinmux.c      |  148 +++++-------
>>  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/cpu.h  |   10 +-
>>  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/gpio.h |  376 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  board/samsung/smdk5250/smdk5250.c       |   24 +--
>>  drivers/gpio/s5p_gpio.c                 |   65 ++++++-
>>  5 files changed, 508 insertions(+), 115 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/s5p_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/s5p_gpio.c
>> index 656bf4a..1b882cb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/s5p_gpio.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/s5p_gpio.c
>> @@ -36,6 +36,27 @@
>>  #define RATE_MASK(x)         (0x1 << (x + 16))
>>  #define RATE_SET(x)          (0x1 << (x + 16))
>>
>> +
>> +struct gpio_info {
>> +     unsigned int reg_addr;  /* Address of register for this part */
>> +     unsigned int max_gpio;  /* Maximum GPIO in this part */
>> +};
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_EXYNOS5
>
> I think, this ifdef is unnecessary.
I had put this #ifdef as EXYNOS4 will also have a gpio_data structure.
>
>> +static const struct gpio_info gpio_data[EXYNOS5_GPIO_NUM_PARTS] = {
>
> maybe it should be exynos5_gpio_data?
No kept it as gpio_data as it would b easy to call the same from
s5p_gpio_get_bank function and exynos4 will also have a separate
structure.
>
>> +     { EXYNOS5_GPIO_PART1_BASE, EXYNOS5_GPIO_MAX_PORT_PART_1 },
>> +     { EXYNOS5_GPIO_PART2_BASE, EXYNOS5_GPIO_MAX_PORT_PART_2 },
>> +     { EXYNOS5_GPIO_PART3_BASE, EXYNOS5_GPIO_MAX_PORT_PART_3 },
>> +     { EXYNOS5_GPIO_PART4_BASE, EXYNOS5_GPIO_MAX_PORT_PART_4 },
>> +     { EXYNOS5_GPIO_PART5_BASE, EXYNOS5_GPIO_MAX_PORT_PART_5 },
>> +     { EXYNOS5_GPIO_PART6_BASE, EXYNOS5_GPIO_MAX_PORT_PART_6 },
>> +     { EXYNOS5_GPIO_PART7_BASE, EXYNOS5_GPIO_MAX_PORT_PART_7 },
>> +     { EXYNOS5_GPIO_PART8_BASE, EXYNOS5_GPIO_MAX_PORT },
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define HAVE_GENERIC_GPIO
>> +#endif
>> +
>>  void s5p_gpio_cfg_pin(struct s5p_gpio_bank *bank, int gpio, int cfg)
>>  {
>>       unsigned int value;
>> @@ -141,7 +162,30 @@ void s5p_gpio_set_rate(struct s5p_gpio_bank *bank, int gpio, int mode)
>>
>>       writel(value, &bank->drv);
>>  }
>> -
>> +#ifdef HAVE_GENERIC_GPIO
>> +static struct s5p_gpio_bank *s5p_gpio_get_bank(unsigned int gpio)
>
> please consider exynos4 also.
Yes will update the same for exynos4 and send as soon as possible.
>
>> +{
>> +     const struct gpio_info *data;
>> +     unsigned int upto;
>> +     int i;
>> +
>> +     for (i = upto = 0, data = gpio_data; i < EXYNOS5_GPIO_NUM_PARTS;
>> +                     i++, upto = data->max_gpio, data++) {
>> +             debug("i=%d, upto=%d\n", i, upto);
>> +             if (gpio < data->max_gpio) {
>> +                     struct s5p_gpio_bank *bank;
>> +                     bank = (struct s5p_gpio_bank *)data->reg_addr;
>> +                     bank += (gpio - upto) / GPIO_PER_BANK;
>> +                     debug("   gpio=%d, bank=%p\n", gpio, bank);
>> +                     return bank;
>> +             }
>> +     }
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
>> +     assert(gpio < EXYNOS5_GPIO_MAX_PORT);   /* ...which it will not be */
>> +#endif
>> +     return NULL;
>> +}
>> +#else
>>  struct s5p_gpio_bank *s5p_gpio_get_bank(unsigned gpio)
>>  {
>>       int bank;
>> @@ -151,6 +195,7 @@ struct s5p_gpio_bank *s5p_gpio_get_bank(unsigned gpio)
>>       bank *= sizeof(struct s5p_gpio_bank);
>>       return (struct s5p_gpio_bank *) (s5p_gpio_base(gpio) + bank);
>>  }
>> +#endif
>>
>>  int s5p_gpio_get_pin(unsigned gpio)
>>  {
>> @@ -196,3 +241,21 @@ int gpio_set_value(unsigned gpio, int value)
>>
>>       return 0;
>>  }
>> +
>> +void gpio_set_pull(int gpio, int mode)
>> +{
>> +     s5p_gpio_set_pull(s5p_gpio_get_bank(gpio),
>> +                     s5p_gpio_get_pin(gpio), mode);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void gpio_set_drv(int gpio, int mode)
>> +{
>> +     s5p_gpio_set_drv(s5p_gpio_get_bank(gpio),
>> +                     s5p_gpio_get_pin(gpio), mode);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void gpio_cfg_pin(int gpio, int cfg)
>> +{
>> +     s5p_gpio_cfg_pin(s5p_gpio_get_bank(gpio),
>> +                     s5p_gpio_get_pin(gpio), cfg);
>> +}
>>
>
> Thanks,
> Minkyu Kang.
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

-- 
Regards,
Rajeshwari Shinde


More information about the U-Boot mailing list